📝【快訊! 2025年6月SAT全解析】
刷題拿 750，不代表你準備好拿 800：6月SAT細節陷阱再升級

6月SAT在結構上延續3月與5月的命題趨勢，但整體題目安排顯示：College Board正在進一步強化學生「閱讀理解」、「證據分析」與「資料推理」能力的考察。閱讀考題加強對語境位置的考察，錯誤選項更善於「錯位引用」前後段落資訊，雖然考題大致熟悉，但細節難度不容小覷，尤其是文意轉折題與圖表解讀，處處藏有陷阱！

📌 閱讀與文法題型趨勢：語境錯位、資料推理、語氣辨識同步出擊

🟡 語境錯位成最大陷阱
許多學生反映：這次閱讀中的錯誤選項不像以往直接錯，而是引用了來自前一句或下一句的資訊，看似合理卻答錯位置。例如在分析某評論家喜歡某本小說的原因時，正確選項針對句中主軸敘述，錯誤選項則混用下一句說明詞彙定義的內容，讓不熟悉句間邏輯的學生誤選。

 

🟡 資料與觀點結構分析題型擴大

• 關於 Julia Bidadanure 支持青年配額制度的文章，考生需結合”accordingly”句中語氣，理解她的論點是出自制度的「工具性價值」。
• 有關金星閃電的科學文章則強調「觀察雖存在，但證據不足」，需選出邏輯上提出替代解釋的句子。
• Denile Road 一題中引用“the road grew out of a goat path in Africa”表現與故鄉的情感連結，而錯誤選項引用的是後一句詩意描寫，出現語境誤導。

 

✅ 跨文本比較再升級

• 多組 paired passages，例如：關於印加戲劇成書時間（1500年 vs 1700年）、Hackberry與太陽能板如何為豆類植物遮陰等，都要求學生精準抓出兩段文本的共同觀點與差異。
• 這類題型比5月更明顯考驗學生「合併資訊」與「對照比對」能力，不能只讀懂一段。

 

🟡 詞彙與語氣題要求更細緻

• Vocabulary 題中考 “attribute to / attributed to”與“testifies to”等詞彙，在句中皆非直譯字面意義，需依上下文判斷語氣與主張是否一致。
• Transition 題也常出現選項如”Thus”、”Nonetheless”、”As such”，錯誤選項如 “For example” 容易讓學生誤解承接邏輯。

🟡 雙篇閱讀＋跨文本推理再升級

• 包含 Hackberry 樹與太陽能板如何為豆科植物遮蔽的兩篇文章、探討印加劇作時間的文本對比等，都要求學生整合資訊並分析細微觀點差異。
• Lemur 月光行為一題則考查學生對「正相關」的理解，並辨別哪一位研究者持有此觀點，錯誤選項會誤配研究者與論點。

🟡 Bullet Points 難度下降但仍藏陷阱

• 多數題目可直接從BP資訊中找出對應描述，如 Chalakoa Thalimium 的定義、冥王星發現過程，但仍有如「人物於1916年過世，卻選1930年作為答案」的陷阱題。
• 相比3月的BP題，本場顯著減少誤導比例，但仍需審慎對應時間、對象、描述細節。

📌 文法與語用題：修辭+語境的高精度考驗

✅ 破折號與分號用法頻繁

• 一題考學生是否能正確去除破折號與分號的使用，錯誤選項多數為語意正確但結構錯置。
• SVA（主詞動詞一致）類型至少出現3題，與3月、5月場相近。

✅ 轉折與承接邏輯考題大增

• 常見選項包括：”Thus”、”Though”、”Nonetheless”、”As such”、”To that end”。
• 題目考察邏輯非字面，例：描述世界盃歷史，正確連接詞為”Though”，錯誤選項”for example”容易誤導學生。

✅ 標點與語態題保持穩定

• 包括：雙重動作語句（使用分號）、所有格判斷（island’s residents）、避免疑問句句型使用等。

📊 圖表與資料題型：圖像閱讀與邏輯關聯考察並重

• 一題問冰雪日數是否增加，另一題問蜘蛛是否偏好黑白花紋，正確答案都需觀察圖像中大方向的分布趨勢，錯誤選項則引導學生聚焦於不具代表性的第一觀察行為或數值。
• 明顯比3月更注重視覺與資料閱讀，選項設計偏重推理過程，非單一觀察。
• 整體難度中等，但對第一次接觸圖表推理的學生來說容易誤判。

🧮 數學模組分析：模組一有餘裕，模組二時間壓力再次爆表

「Math 1 我有很多時間剩下，Math 2 又來不及寫完了。老實說我會很驚訝如果能破750……但我也不覺得比3月那場（710分）考得更差。」

✅ 模組一題型標準，速度掌握容易

• 題目較為直接，大多為基礎函數、百分比與比值等常見題型。
• 對有基礎者而言時間充裕，答題節奏不吃緊。

❗️ 模組二計算＋邏輯同步升級，時間壓力明顯， 圖形計算器（Desmos）使用依舊關鍵

• 視覺化分析依舊能有效解決某些題目，但不代表可以忽略代數邏輯能力。
• 本場數學文字描述較長，選項混淆度略高，時間控制成最大壓力點。
• 題型如根據O18同位素推論海水溫度變化，需跨資料整合，並推理「哪些數據會削弱原假設」。
• 考生普遍反映：文字題資訊量大、計算步驟多，如果無法立刻判斷解法，時間很快就會耗盡。

📌 與3月／5月考試比較

項目	3月場	5月場	6月場
閱讀陷阱	以詞彙混淆與資訊遮掩為主	支持／削弱題激增，修辭結構複雜	引用錯位選項成主流，段落語境精準度更重要
文法與過渡語	結構題穩定、標點比例偏高	過渡詞邏輯性要求大幅提升	修辭＋語氣選項干擾加重
數學模組二	難度偏中，時間控制尚可	第7題後明顯變難，資訊量偏大	題型複雜度上升、推理深度增加，時間吃緊
Bullet Points	初次出現，題型變化多	考題設計較精細，陷阱多	難度回穩，易得分但仍需注意時間與對象錯位
圖表解讀	題數少，結構單一	數據量上升，圖表與邏輯需同步理解	雖不難，但關鍵細節與推理方向誤導性高

 

📢 結語：別只靠題感，這場考試要的是「讀對位置」與「看懂邏輯」
SAT難度沒有劇烈變化，但「細節設計」正在悄悄分出誰能突破高分門檻。特別是閱讀中的「錯句選項」、數學中跨題邏輯整合、文法中轉折語氣判斷，都是關鍵。

📌 重點提醒：
下一場考試，你是要維持現狀，還是準備真正突破？

如果你準備的是750，那刷題可能就夠了；但如果你目標是800，你得真正搞懂題目「為什麼這樣設計、錯在哪裡、選項怎麼引導你錯」。熟記解法仍然重要，但若無法靈活應用於跨步驟推理題或高鑑別度的語意敘述題，分數將難以突破高段，這才是真正的考場差距所在。

 

📢 給未來考生的提醒
這次考試再次證明：SAT 不再是拼題感，而是拼邏輯與理解。若你準備迎戰 8 月或 10 月場考試，現在就應開始強化以下能力：

• 快速準確判讀句意與轉折關係
• 練習圖表推理與資訊整合
• 精熟 Desmos 使用同時不忽略代數與函數邏輯
• 模擬時間壓力下的閱讀＋資料解釋

別等考完才後悔讀錯方向，現在就調整才是真正的「準備」。

 

📝【Breaking News! Full Breakdown of the June 2025 SAT】
Scoring 750 Through Drilling Doesn’t Mean You’re Ready for 800: The June SAT Raises the Bar with Finer Traps

The structure of the June SAT followed the same general pattern seen in the March and May tests, but the question design made it clear: the College Board is doubling down on testing students’ skills in reading comprehension, evidence evaluation, and data reasoning.

Reading questions placed a greater emphasis on contextual precision, with incorrect options cleverly referencing ideas from previous or following sentences—making them harder to detect. While the format may have felt familiar, the subtle complexity of the test, especially in logical transitions and graph interpretation, made it full of hidden traps.

 

📌 Reading and Writing Trends: Contextual Misdirection, Data Reasoning, and Tone Recognition All in Play

🟡 Contextual Misdirection as the Biggest Trap
Many students reported that this time, incorrect answer choices in the reading section weren’t blatantly wrong. Instead, they cleverly referenced information from the sentence before or after the target sentence—making them seem plausible while actually missing the point.

For example, in a question asking why a critic liked a particular novel, the correct answer focused on the main idea of the underlined sentence. However, a common trap option drew on the next sentence, which only explained the meaning of a specific term—leading students unfamiliar with inter-sentence logic to choose incorrectly.

 

🟡 Expansion of Data and Argument Structure Analysis

• In the passage where Julia Bidadanure advocates for youth quotas, students needed to interpret the tone in the sentence using “accordingly” to understand that her argument was based on the instrumental value of the policy—not fairness alone.
• In the science passage about lightning on Venus, the test emphasized that observations exist, but evidence is lacking—so students had to identify a sentence that logically introduced an alternative explanation.
• In the Denile Road question, the quote “the road grew out of a goat path in Africa” was the key to showing the speaker’s emotional connection to their homeland. The trap answer, however, referenced the poetic line in the following sentence—leading students to choose a contextually misplaced response.

✅ Cross-Textual Comparison Further Upgraded

• Several paired passages appeared on the test—such as one debating when an Inca play was written (1500s vs. 1700s), and another comparing how a Hackberry tree and solar panels provide shade for bean plants.
• These questions required students to accurately identify both shared viewpoints and subtle differences across two texts. Compared to the May SAT, this test placed an even stronger emphasis on the ability to synthesize information and draw comparisons—understanding just one passage wasn’t enough.

 

🟡 Vocabulary and Tone Questions Require Greater Precision

• In vocabulary-in-context questions, words like “attribute to / attributed to” and “testifies to” did not carry their literal dictionary meanings. Instead, students had to interpret them within the sentence’s context and judge whether the tone and implied claim were consistent.
• Transition word questions also appeared frequently, with correct choices such as “Thus,” “Nonetheless,” and “As such.” Trap answers like “For example” often misled students by disrupting the logical flow, especially when the sentence wasn’t meant to introduce an illustration.

🟡 Paired Passages + Cross-Textual Reasoning Take Center Stage

• Passages comparing the shading effects of Hackberry trees and solar panels on bean plants, as well as differing views on when an Inca play was written (1500s vs. 1700s), required students to synthesize information across texts and detect subtle differences in perspective.
• In another passage on lemurs’ behavior under moonlight, students had to understand the meaning of a positive correlation—that both variables increase together—and correctly identify which researcher held that view. A common trap involved misattributing findings to the wrong researcher.

🟡 Bullet Point Questions Were Easier—but Not Without Traps

• Most bullet point questions could be answered directly by matching the information, such as identifying the definition of Chalakoa Thalimium or recognizing key facts in Pluto’s discovery.
• However, traps still existed—for example, one question incorrectly credited an action in 1930 to a person who, according to the bullet points, had died in 1916.
• Compared to the March test, misleading options were noticeably fewer this time, but students still needed to pay close attention to timelines, subjects, and specific wording.
  

📌 Grammar and Rhetorical Skills: Precision in Structure and Context

✅ Heavy Emphasis on Dashes and Semicolons

• One question tested whether students could correctly remove a dash and semicolon from a sentence. Most incorrect options sounded logically fine but failed structurally—highlighting the importance of punctuation placement, not just meaning.
• Subject-Verb Agreement (SVA) Still a Core Focus

✅ More Questions on Logical Transitions and Cohesion

• Common correct transitions included “Thus,” “Though,” “Nonetheless,” “As such,” and “To that end.”
• These questions didn’t test word definitions, but logical fit. For example, in a question about the evolution of the World Cup, the correct answer was “Though” to indicate contrast—while the misleading “For example” drew students into a logic trap.

✅ Punctuation and Tone Usage Remained Stable

• Other topics included compound action sentences requiring semicolons, possessive forms like “island’s residents,” and eliminating unnecessary question-format phrases such as “What has earned him his reputation.”

📊 Graphs and Data Questions: Emphasis on Visual Interpretation and Logical Reasoning

• One question asked whether the number of icy winter days had increased; another tested whether spiders showed a preference for black-and-white patterns. In both cases, the correct answer required recognizing overall trends in the data.
• Trap choices tried to divert attention toward isolated first observations or outlier values—rather than the big-picture distribution.
• Compared to March, this section clearly placed greater emphasis on visual comprehension and data-driven inference. The options were designed to test reasoning, not just observation.
• Overall, the difficulty was moderate—but students encountering this type of question for the first time were more likely to misread or misinterpret the graphs.

🧮 Math Module Breakdown: Plenty of Time in Module 1, But Module 2 Was a Race Against the Clock

“I had lots of time left in Math 1. But in Math 2, I ran out of time again. Honestly, I’d be surprised if I broke 750… but I don’t think I did worse than March (710).”

 

✅ Module 1: Standard Question Types, Manageable Pace

• The questions in Math Module 1 were straightforward, focusing mostly on familiar topics like basic functions, percentages, and ratios.
• For students with a solid foundation, this section felt comfortable—time was more than sufficient, and the pacing was relaxed.

❗️ Module 2: Heavier on Calculation and Logic, with Intense Time Pressure — Desmos Still Crucial

• Visual tools like Desmos remained helpful for certain questions, especially those involving graphs or functions. However, relying on it alone wasn’t enough—algebraic reasoning and quick interpretation were still essential.
• In this test, word problems were longer and the answer choices more subtly different, making time management the biggest challenge.
• For example, one question involved using O18 isotopes to infer changes in ocean temperature. To answer correctly, students had to synthesize multiple pieces of data and reason through which new evidence would weaken the original hypothesis.
• Many students noted that these questions had a high volume of information and multiple calculation steps. If they couldn’t immediately see a clear solution path, they quickly ran out of time.

 

Category	March Test	May Test	June Test
Reading Traps	Focused on vocabulary confusion and info gaps	Surge in support/undermine questions; more rhetorical complexity	Misplaced references dominate; precise understanding of paragraph context is essential
Grammar & Transitions	Structure-focused, high ratio of punctuation questions	Logical flow of transitions became more demanding	Heavier use of rhetorical tone and transition traps
Math Module 2	Moderate difficulty, time manageable	Noticeable difficulty spike after Q7; more data to process	Increased complexity and reasoning depth; strict time pressure
Bullet Points	First appearance; mixed question types	More refined design, with frequent traps	Easier overall, but still requires close attention to time and subject alignment
Graph Interpretation	Few questions, simple format	More data-heavy; required logic + visual comprehension	Not too hard, but misdirection in details and reasoning paths common

📢 Conclusion: Don’t Just Rely on Test-Taking Instinct—This Test Demands “Precise Targeting” and “Clear Logic”

 

The overall difficulty of the SAT hasn’t changed drastically—but the subtlety in question design is quietly becoming the key factor that separates top scorers from the rest.

In particular, misplaced answer choices in reading, cross-question logic integration in math, and tone-sensitive transition decisions in grammar are emerging as the true points of differentiation. Success now depends not just on getting the right answer—but on understanding exactly why it’s right.

 

📌 Key Takeaway:
Are you aiming to stay where you are—or are you ready to break through?

If your goal is a 750, drilling practice sets might be enough.
But if you’re chasing an 800, you need to truly understand why each question is designed the way it is, where the traps are, and how wrong answers are crafted to mislead you.

Memorizing methods still matters—but without the ability to apply them flexibly to multi-step reasoning or high-difficulty language logic, your score will plateau.

That’s the real gap between strong test-takers and top scorers.

 

📢 A Final Reminder for Future Test-Takers
This test made it clearer than ever: the SAT is no longer about “feeling out” the right answer—it’s about logic and deep understanding.

If you’re gearing up for the August or October test, now is the time to start strengthening the skills that truly matter:

 

• Learn to quickly and accurately interpret sentence meaning and logical transitions
• Practice graph-based reasoning and multi-source information integration
• Master Desmos for visualization, but don’t neglect algebra and function logic
• Simulate test conditions with timed reading and data analysis drills

Don’t wait until test day to realize you were practicing the wrong way—adjust now, and that adjustment becomes true preparation.

 

｜2025 年：把握每一次提升的機會

2025 年新增的9 月SAT 考试场次，为学生提供了更多灵活规划与提高分数的机会。同时，这一改变也显示出标准化考试在大学申请中的重要性仍然不容忽视。 AEI亚美教育强调，考生应充分利用时间，提早做好准备，确保每一次挑战都能以最佳状态迎接，为梦想大学的申请增添一份强有力的支持。也提醒考生！ 8 月、9 月、10 月，三场考试的间隔时间非常短，因此无法在这段时间内进行大幅度的能力提升，考前需要先打好基础，包括词汇量、逻辑思维能力、学习习惯与专注力。

AEI 独创Digital SAT 模考系统介绍（点我）

 

对SAT 还有有任何疑问吗？

马上联系 AEI 课程顾问，把握黄金准备期与最完善的考前规划！